[Remember, volcanic and solar activity drive global weather patterns. Our day-to-day does not affect the weather (HAARP-style 'ionospheric heaters' can, but regular people have no access to those, do they?). The planet's problem is not 'climate change', it's POLLUTION... but this Earth Hour thing might have a big impact]
Showing posts with label Global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global warming. Show all posts
3.03.2010
2.17.2010
Global Warming: Where is the Evidence?
Today, the Kyoto Protocol will reach the fifth anniversary of its entry into force. But John Christy says that new research is casting doubt on claims that the earth is warming. Some even suggest the world may not be warming much at all. The temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global change, he said. He is a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a former lead author on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
1.27.2010
12 more glaciers that haven’t heard the news about global warming
http://www.ihatethemedia.com/12-more-glaciers-that-havent-heard-the-news-about-global-warming
The glaciers are melting! The glaciers are melting! The glaciers are…uhhhhh…never mind.
Turns out the IPCC’s chicken little story that all the Himalayan glaciers are melting is just another exaggeration. Or fraud. Take your choice. You know, like the stats coming out of East Anglia CRU. And its claim that Antarctica is melting. And that Greenland’s ice cap is melting. And that sea levels are rising. And that the polar bears are dying. Fact is, some glaciers are retreating, but many others around the world are growing.
“But how is that possible? How can glaciers be growing when the world is warming up like a package of Jiffy-Pop in a microwave?”
Here are a dozen glaciers (or groups of glaciers) around the world that are growing almost as quickly as global warming skepticism.
Read more...Turns out the IPCC’s chicken little story that all the Himalayan glaciers are melting is just another exaggeration. Or fraud. Take your choice. You know, like the stats coming out of East Anglia CRU. And its claim that Antarctica is melting. And that Greenland’s ice cap is melting. And that sea levels are rising. And that the polar bears are dying. Fact is, some glaciers are retreating, but many others around the world are growing.
“But how is that possible? How can glaciers be growing when the world is warming up like a package of Jiffy-Pop in a microwave?”
Here are a dozen glaciers (or groups of glaciers) around the world that are growing almost as quickly as global warming skepticism.
- Himalayan glaciers are growing, not shrinking.
- Alaska’s Hubbard glacier. Growing. A lot.
- Norwegian glaciers. Growing again.
- Glaciers growing on Canada’s tallest mountain.
- North to Alaska and more growing glaciers.
- Glaciers are growing in California. California?
- A glacier is growing on Washington’s Mt. St. Helens.
- Glaciers are growing in France and Switzerland, too.
- New Zealand’s largest glaciers are growing.
- Russia’s glaciers are growing, too.
- Argentina’s Perito Moreno glacier is, you guessed it, growing.
- Iceland’s Breidamerkurjokull glacier. Yup, it’s growing, too.
1.15.2010
1.08.2010
The Church of Global Warming
[And, the print/download-able presentation by Climate Review...]
[Also, go to www.climategate.com for more info...]
12.18.2009
100 Reasons why the 'Copenhagen' Governments and other proponents, of "man-made" Global Warming theory of Climate Change, are completely wrong
12.17.2009
12.15.2009
HAARP & CO2
HAARP, a secret weapon of mass destruction.
High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP).
HAARP is fully operational and can be used to trigger floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes, raise the sea levels and blame the global-warming, and they can cause tsunami ocean waves at will. These acts of global terrorism and destruction will be described as natural events by the complicit MEDIA and all governments are swallowing this false propaganda.
700+ Scientists Debunk Man-Made Global Warming
· US Senate Minority Report.
· Environment & Public Works Committee.
· Environment & Public Works Committee.
12.07.2009
12.03.2009
7.01.2009
CEI Releases Global Warming Study Censored by EPA
http://cei.org/news-release/2009/06/25/cei-releases-global-warming-study-censored-epa
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=7512e683-3f86-4233-b73e-b23e1aa1bbd0)
The Competitive Enterprise Institute is today making public an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency. Internal EPA email messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the Administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide.
The report finds that EPA, by adopting the United Nations’ 2007 “Fourth Assessment” report, is relying on outdated research and is ignoring major new developments. Those developments include a continued decline in global temperatures, a new consensus that future hurricanes will not be more frequent or intense, and new findings that water vapor will moderate, rather than exacerbate, temperature.
New data also indicate that ocean cycles are probably the most important single factor in explaining temperature fluctuations, though solar cycles may play a role as well, and that reliable satellite data undercut the likelihood of endangerment from greenhouse gases. All of this demonstrates EPA should independently analyze the science, rather than just adopt the conclusions of outside organizations.
Read more...The report finds that EPA, by adopting the United Nations’ 2007 “Fourth Assessment” report, is relying on outdated research and is ignoring major new developments. Those developments include a continued decline in global temperatures, a new consensus that future hurricanes will not be more frequent or intense, and new findings that water vapor will moderate, rather than exacerbate, temperature.
New data also indicate that ocean cycles are probably the most important single factor in explaining temperature fluctuations, though solar cycles may play a role as well, and that reliable satellite data undercut the likelihood of endangerment from greenhouse gases. All of this demonstrates EPA should independently analyze the science, rather than just adopt the conclusions of outside organizations.
6.19.2009
Rutgers Professor Warns Geoengineering Could “Create Disasters,” Global Famine
·National Academy of Sciences debates spraying aerosols into upper stratosphere to combat global warming.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/rutgers-professor-warns-geoengineering-could-create-disasters-global-famine.html
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=b2d21be7-d0b5-4692-b662-2fcf157723a8)
http://www.prisonplanet.com/rutgers-professor-warns-geoengineering-could-create-disasters-global-famine.html
Debate surrounding the possibility of geoengineering the earth’s climate by lining the atmosphere with aerosol particles has moved from idle speculation to serious consideration, and was a core topic of discussion at a recent National Academy of Sciences workshop.
However, a top Rutgers University professor warned at the meeting that tampering with the planet’s delicate ecosystem could create famines and droughts, threatening the lives of no less than a third of the world’s population.
The plan to shoot aerosols - dust particles - into the earth’s upper stratosphere in an attempt to cool the planet and offset the purported effects of global warming, should be considered as an “emergency response” to a climate crisis, according to Harvard University’s Dan Schrag, who told the workshop that such a crisis was already underway.
[...]
According to an NPR report on the meeting, University of Calgary’s David Keith urged the introduction of geoengineering experiments on a global scale and that they should be conducted “sooner rather than later”.
[...]
As we have previously highlighted, discussions regarding the possibility of “geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming by “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays” has stoked fresh concerns that similar programs are already underway, and that chemtrails are directly connected to such experimentation.
[...]
Last year, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature. The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.”
[...]
As we covered in a previous in-depth report, numerous universities and government agencies have been conducting studies in the field of geoengineering for years.
[...]
In a document entitled Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering, the CFR proposes different methods of “reflecting sunlight back into space,” which include adding “small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere,” adding “more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere,” and placing “various kinds of reflecting objects in space either near the earth or at a stable location between the earth and the sun.”
The proposals in the CFR document match exactly the atmospheric effects observed in the aftermath of chemtrail spraying.
Read all of it...However, a top Rutgers University professor warned at the meeting that tampering with the planet’s delicate ecosystem could create famines and droughts, threatening the lives of no less than a third of the world’s population.
The plan to shoot aerosols - dust particles - into the earth’s upper stratosphere in an attempt to cool the planet and offset the purported effects of global warming, should be considered as an “emergency response” to a climate crisis, according to Harvard University’s Dan Schrag, who told the workshop that such a crisis was already underway.
[...]
According to an NPR report on the meeting, University of Calgary’s David Keith urged the introduction of geoengineering experiments on a global scale and that they should be conducted “sooner rather than later”.
[...]
As we have previously highlighted, discussions regarding the possibility of “geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming by “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays” has stoked fresh concerns that similar programs are already underway, and that chemtrails are directly connected to such experimentation.
[...]
Last year, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature. The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.”
[...]
As we covered in a previous in-depth report, numerous universities and government agencies have been conducting studies in the field of geoengineering for years.
[...]
In a document entitled Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering, the CFR proposes different methods of “reflecting sunlight back into space,” which include adding “small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere,” adding “more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere,” and placing “various kinds of reflecting objects in space either near the earth or at a stable location between the earth and the sun.”
The proposals in the CFR document match exactly the atmospheric effects observed in the aftermath of chemtrail spraying.
4.07.2009
Satélites de la NASA revelan la persistente reducción del hielo en el Ártico
[ATENCIÓN: para una visión 'diametralmente' opuesta a la contenida en este artículo, ver el post de marzo del 2009, Rise Of Sea Levels Is Greatest Lie Ever. Pero mejor visitar el blog Heliogenic.]
http://www.elperiodico.com/default.asp?idpublicacio_PK=46&idioma=CAS&idnoticia_PK=601904&idseccio_PK=1021
Imagen captada por satélite en la que se observa la extensión máxima del hielo sobre el mar en el período 2008-09. Foto: EFE / NASA HANDOUT
Las últimas imágenes de los satélites han revelado que los hielos marinos y la plataforma gélida del Ártico continúan reduciéndose como resultado del aumento global de las temperaturas, según ha informado la NASA.
El hielo espeso y antiguo ha comenzado a disminuir y está siendo sustituido por hielo nuevo y delgado que es mucho más vulnerable, según ha indicado la agencia espacial estadounidense.
El anuncio de la reducción de la masa de hielo ártico ha sido difundido tres días después de que el Instituto Geológico de EEUU (USGS) informara de que el cambio climático está derritiendo los glaciares antárticos mucho más rápido de lo que se creía hasta ahora.
Si quieres saber qué más tiene que decir la NASA sobre esto, continúa aquí...
[Además, por si hacía falta, los de LaVanguardia no se querían quedar atrás y publicaron su propio artículo titulado (con la misma fecha!), La NASA revela la persistente reducción del hielo Ártico.]
El hielo espeso y antiguo ha comenzado a disminuir y está siendo sustituido por hielo nuevo y delgado que es mucho más vulnerable, según ha indicado la agencia espacial estadounidense.
El anuncio de la reducción de la masa de hielo ártico ha sido difundido tres días después de que el Instituto Geológico de EEUU (USGS) informara de que el cambio climático está derritiendo los glaciares antárticos mucho más rápido de lo que se creía hasta ahora.
Si quieres saber qué más tiene que decir la NASA sobre esto, continúa aquí...
[Además, por si hacía falta, los de LaVanguardia no se querían quedar atrás y publicaron su propio artículo titulado (con la misma fecha!), La NASA revela la persistente reducción del hielo Ártico.]
[ATENCIÓN: para una visión 'diametralmente' opuesta a la contenida en estos artículos, ver el post de marzo del 2009, Rise Of Sea Levels Is Greatest Lie Ever. Pero mejor visitar el blog Heliogenic.]
4.02.2009
La agricultura española, la más amenazada por el cambio climático
http://www.agrocope.com/noticias.php?id=96628&comu=
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=cab7b58b-4c6c-4360-a2aa-e11ff79c35c5)
La CE ha propuesto medidas de ajuste para frenar los daños del cambio climático en la agricultura como la mejora en la gestión del agua o la elección de cultivos más resistentes. Además, augura una reducción de las precipitaciones en España del 40%.
Entre los estados más perjudicados: España y otros países del sur. Por ello, la Comisión Europea presentó ayer una serie de medidas para frenar los daños del cambio climático en la agricultura y ganadería.
Entre las propuestas dela CE destaca la mejora en la gestión del agua o la elección de cultivos más resistentes de cara al calentamiento del planeta. (!!!)
Tras analizar los efectos que puede tener en la agricultura de los países comunitarios, concluyó en que los países del sur, entre los que se encuentra España, son los más afectados, según recoge Efeagro.
De hecho, afirmó que habrá una reducción de las precipitaciones enla Península del 40 por ciento a finales de este siglo, además de un descenso de los rendimientos, problemas en el abastecimiento alimentario y un incremento de la escasez del agua.
Por esta razón, pidió a estos países que actúen con medidas como rotaciones más equilibradas de cultivos, introducción de producciones que requieran menos agua y conservación de materia orgánica de los suelos.
[Así, metiendo miedo con la mentira del cambio climático, se quedarán con la tierra y el agua; y obligarán a todos los agricultores a usar semillas transgénicas (que son más resistentes!!! Aquí entra Monsanto!), cuyos efectos nocivos sobre la salud se encubren con el beneplácito de los lacayos políticos!]
Entre los estados más perjudicados: España y otros países del sur. Por ello, la Comisión Europea presentó ayer una serie de medidas para frenar los daños del cambio climático en la agricultura y ganadería.
Entre las propuestas de
Tras analizar los efectos que puede tener en la agricultura de los países comunitarios, concluyó en que los países del sur, entre los que se encuentra España, son los más afectados, según recoge Efeagro.
De hecho, afirmó que habrá una reducción de las precipitaciones en
Por esta razón, pidió a estos países que actúen con medidas como rotaciones más equilibradas de cultivos, introducción de producciones que requieran menos agua y conservación de materia orgánica de los suelos.
[Así, metiendo miedo con la mentira del cambio climático, se quedarán con la tierra y el agua; y obligarán a todos los agricultores a usar semillas transgénicas (que son más resistentes!!! Aquí entra Monsanto!), cuyos efectos nocivos sobre la salud se encubren con el beneplácito de los lacayos políticos!]
3.31.2009
Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'
The uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story, writes Christopher Booker.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/5067351/Rise-of-sea-levels-is-the-greatest-lie-ever-told.html 
For 'Shocking Facts About Sea Level Rise' go here...
If one thing more than any other is used to justify proposals that the world must spend tens of trillions of dollars on combating global warming, it is the belief that we face a disastrous rise in sea levels. The Antarctic and Greenland ice caps will melt, we are told, warming oceans will expand, and the result will be catastrophe.
Although the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) only predicts a sea level rise of 59cm (17 inches) by 2100, Al Gore in his Oscar-winning film An Inconvenient Truth went much further, talking of 20 feet, and showing computer graphics of cities such as Shanghai and San Francisco half under water. We all know the graphic showing central London in similar plight. As for tiny island nations such as the Maldives and Tuvalu, as Prince Charles likes to tell us and the Archbishop of Canterbury was again parroting last week, they are due to vanish.
But if there is one scientist who knows more about sea levels than anyone else in the world it is the Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Mörner, formerly chairman of the INQUA International Commission on Sea Level Change. And the uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner, who for 35 years has been using every known scientific method to study sea levels all over the globe, is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story.
Despite fluctuations down as well as up, "the sea is not rising," he says. "It hasn't risen in 50 years." If there is any rise this century it will "not be more than 10cm (four inches), with an uncertainty of plus or minus 10cm". And quite apart from examining the hard evidence, he says, the elementary laws of physics (latent heat needed to melt ice) tell us that the apocalypse conjured up by Al Gore and Co could not possibly come about.
The reason why Dr Mörner, formerly a Stockholm professor, is so certain that these claims about sea level rise are 100 per cent wrong is that they are all based on computer model predictions, whereas his findings are based on "going into the field to observe what is actually happening in the real world".
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=3ae721ba-512f-4922-a97e-66f57aa11d28)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.png)
